HRSA & the YMCA form Partnership to rebuild the YMCA!

As HRSA moves forward to solidify partners and chose the best location for the Regional Sports Center, it became clear that the City of Helena’s Centennial Park site and the YMCA mission of serving our community’s youth are a good fit with the goals of the HRSA.  To this end, HRSA and the YMCA have been working together, along side the City of Helena, to explore the possibilities and opportunities of rebuilding the current YMCA facility as the new Helena Regional Sports Center & YMCA.  While still very conceptual at this point, below are the current plan diagrams and images of what is possible!

 

Study Completion Guides Sports Facility Vision

The Helena Regional Sports Association, with professional guidance from Ballard-King and Highland Economics, has completed our assessment of the feasibility of a multi-sport complex in Helena.  The completed document offers guidance about the optimal size of the facility, potential locations, and amenities Helena residents most value.

Preferred Option Includes an  Indoor Field

Helena residents told us that they overwhelmingly support the development of a large indoor space for soccer, lacrosse and other field sports.  The passage of the school bond in spring 2017, which will bring three new full-size gymnasiums to the Helena area before 2020, has allowed HRSA to decrease the number of gyms in our vision from four to two so that an indoor field can be included in our preferred option.  The plan diagram below shows one possible configuration of the spaces, which will also include an elevated walk/jog track (not shown).  Click here for a larger image of the plan diagram.

Preferred Location Leverages Potential Partnerships

HRSA is currently exploring the possibility of redeveloping the YMCA site at Centennial Park, in partnership with the YMCA and the City of Helena.  The City, as property owner, has expressed it’s willingness to allow the proposed expansion under the terms of the current YMCA lease.  There are New Market Tax Credit incentives which could provide up to 20% of the total project cost, a reality that makes this a desirable site purely from a financial standpoint.

The site is also experiencing high concentrations of methane during the warmest days of the summer, due to an expensive-to-operate methane mitigation system installed decades ago.  New, inexpensive methane mitigation systems have proven effective on the west side of Centennial Park, near the new Carroll College dorms, so replacing the old system could provide cost savings to City of Helena taxpayers while improving human health and safety.

The central location, roughly halfway between Helena’s high schools and middle schools, is appealing from an operations standpoint, as it allows for the expansion of partnerships that already exist between the YMCA and the public schools to provide after-school programs. It is relatively easy to provide transportation for students from area schools to a facility at Centennial Park compared to many of the other locations that HRSA evaluated.

Time is of the Essence

In both in-person interviews and online survey responses Helena-area residents, including those who live in north Jefferson County, overwhelmingly favored a facility that provides for community needs over a facility dedicated to large tournaments & events.  Nearly all respondents to in-person and online surveys agreed that providing space for residents to practice and play regular games is the priority.  This preference influenced HRSA’s decision to pursue a smaller, less-expensive facility at the Centennial Park location as our first choice.  In choosing to pursue a smaller, less-expensive facility, HRSA is recognizing that time is of the essence for many sports enthusiasts who currently cannot find adequate spaces in Helena at all during Montana’s long winter months.

Future Opportunities Exist

During the demographic portion of the feasibility study, Ballard-King identified the fact that the Helena area is growing primarily to the south and east, and pointed to the area near the intersection of I-15 and Highway 12 as a prime location for a sports facility because of that trend.  HRSA evaluated many sites in this area, and concluded that there remains a high potential for a sports facility to be developed here if a generous landowner with 10 – 12 acres of property appears on the scene in the future.  Because the proposed HRSA facility will satisfy Helena’s demand for aquatic spaces, but will not fully satisfy the demand for tournament- and events-hosting spaces, there remains significant potential for a second facility that could enjoy lower operating costs by focusing on non-aquatic spaces such as gymnasiums, indoor fields, and a competition track.

Facility Options That Match Helena’s Needs and Resources

There are a range of facility options that the Helena region can afford to build and operate.  HRSA is currently examining the three options, inviting community input, and evaluating potential facility locations.  Leave your comments on this page, or join us at Ales for Charity night to provide feedback.

Option 1Option 2Option 3
GymnasiumTwo High School
2 @ 84x50 feet
Four High School
4 @ 84x50 feet
Four High School
4 @ 84x50 feet
Competition Swimming Pool8-lane, 25 yard
(no meters course)
Starting blocks, cool water temperature
25 yard x 25 meter
(10 lanes x 25 yards)
Starting blocks, cool water temperature
25 yard x 25 meter
(10 lanes x 25 yards)
Starting blocks, cool water temperature
Community Activity Pool2,500 square feet
Beach-style entry, warm water temperature
3,500 square feet
Beach-style entry, warm water temperature
3,500 square feet
Beach-style entry, warm water temperature
Walk/Jog Track
noneElevated, 12 laps per mileElevated, 12 laps per mile
Field HousenonenoneTwo fields,
2 @ 200x85 feet
Building Area47,000 sq ft76,000 sq ft129,000 sq ft
Land Required3 – 5 acres7 – 9 acres10 – 12 acres
Capital Cost$20 Million$31 Million$46 Million

It is important to note that none of these facility options are projected to cover their operating costs. There are no examples of indoor recreation facilities in Montana or any neighboring states that break even or are profitable.  This explains why no private companies have stepped in to fill the demand for these facilities.  Five-year budget projections for each of the facility options are shown below.  Economies of scale are at work here; the largest facility option experiences the smallest annual operating loss.

Projected 5-Year Averages Option 1Option 2Option 3
Annual Revenue$1,324,106
$1,666,416$2,178,968
Annual Cost$1,648,028 $2,025,378$2,380,934
Annual Operating Loss$323,922$358,962$201,967
Cost Recovery Percentage80%82%92%

The estimated annual operating loss of each facility is just as important as the capital cost-to-build when comparing facility options.

 

Why Not Just Cover Memorial Pool?

During the community interviews that took place in mid‐2016, business leaders and community residents frequently raised the question, “Why not just cover Memorial Pool?” In response, HRSA has explored the feasibility and cost of covering Memorial Pool and providing some of the same amenities included in the lowest‐cost option currently under consideration for a new sports & recreation facility. A summary of this comparison is shown below.

New Facility: Low-Cost OptionCover Memorial Pool Option
GymnasiumsTwo High School
2 @ 84x50 feet
Four High School
4 @ 84x50 feet
Competition Swimming Pool8-lane, 25 yard
(no meters course)
Starting blocks, cool water temperature
25 yard x 50 meter
(20 lanes x 25 yards)
Starting blocks, cool water temperature
Community Activity Pool2,500 sq. ft.
Beach-style entry, warm water temperature
none
Building Area47,000 sq. ft.68,000 sq. ft.
Capital Cost$20 Million$15 Million

Although the “Cover Memorial” option provides an approximately $5 Million savings in capital construction costs over the lowest new facility option, covering Memorial Pool would not meet the current sports & recreation needs of the Helena region. In addition, the operating costs for both utilities and staffing would be higher with the “Cover Memorial” option.

Covering Memorial Pool also represents a loss of existing amenities because Helena would no longer have an outdoor pool.

Functional, Operational & Community Priorities Would Not Be Met

  • Short course (25‐yard) competitive swim meets cannot be hosted in Memorial Pool due to shallow water depths. Hosting High School swim meets is therefore not feasible.
  • The single large water tank does not provide a warm water family pool, which is needed for financial vitality and learn‐to-swim programs.
  • Site constraints require two disconnected buildings, the gym and natatorium. This increases operational costs over the life of the facility.
  • Memorial Pool has a deep diving well, and that increased volume of water increases utility costs.
  • Covering Memorial Pool removes the community’s only outdoor swimming pool and largest outdoor ice rink.
  • There is no space at the site for future amenities such as a field house, family pool, or indoor track.

Covering Memorial Pool fails to provide important amenities and spaces, costs more to maintain and operate and will require Helena to give up existing amenities. It is a “penny‐wise, pound‐foolish” proposal.

A full, printable analysis of covering Memorial Pool is available.

 

Sports Facility Experts Selected

Recreation consulting firm Ballard*King of Colorado has been awarded the contract to complete a feasibility study for a sports complex in Helena.  Ballard*King has helped many communities design quality recreational facilities, including Missoula’s “Splash Montana“.

Representatives from the firm will visit in Helena in May, 2016 to conduct interviews with community leaders and potential facility user groups in a variety of Helena local sports associations.